If you believe Canada needs strong federal standards, transparent oversight, and real protections before expanding AI and cloud‑infrastructure mega projects, now is the time to speak up.

What You Can Do
Use the letter below to share your concerns with federal representatives, local MPs, community groups, and national organizations. You can use the letter as is, or modify it as you deem appropriate:

1. Email your MP using this federal feedback letter

2. Submit comments to:
   Peter Wall
   Deputy Chief of Staff and Director of Communications
   Office of the Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario
   peter.wall@ised-isde.gc.ca
   343-543-5391

and Media Relations
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
media@ised-isde.gc.ca

3. Share this call to action with neighbours, advocacy groups, and local councils

4. Encourage others to request mandatory federal standards, health impact assessments, renewable‑energy requirements, and data‑sovereignty protections

Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on the federal government’s recently released principles for data‑centre development. I appreciate the effort to establish a national framework for an industry that is expanding rapidly across Canada. However, after reviewing the proposed principles, I am concerned that they lack the strength, clarity, and enforceability required to protect Canadians, national infrastructure, and the environment.

Because data‑centre development intersects directly with federal responsibilities, including national environmental protection, interprovincial energy systems, climate commitments, public‑health protection under federal environmental law, and regulation of multi-national digital‑infrastructure operators, it is essential that the federal framework provide meaningful safeguards. At present, it does not.

To ensure responsible national development, the federal principles must be strengthened in the following areas:

Lack of federal enforcement mechanisms
The principles contain no compliance requirements, penalties, or enforcement tools. Without binding federal standards, companies may treat the principles as voluntary guidelines rather than obligations.

Absence of mandatory national standards
Despite federal jurisdiction over environmental protection, interprovincial energy systems, and multinational digital‑infrastructure companies, the principles do not establish any mandatory baseline that all data centres must meet.

Vague and non‑quantifiable language
Terms such as “minimize water use and environmental impacts” are subjective and unenforceable. Federal policy must include numeric limits, clear definitions, and national evaluation criteria.

No federal accountability or legal repercussions
The principles do not outline federal monitoring, reporting obligations, or legal consequences for non‑compliance, leaving communities vulnerable to unchecked industrial expansion.

No requirement for renewable‑energy investment
Data centres impose massive electrical loads on Canada’s national grid. Operators should be required to contribute to renewable‑energy infrastructure to align with Canada’s climate commitments.

Risk of upward pressure on electricity rates
Large‑scale increases in demand can strain national supply and trigger federally regulated infrastructure investments, potentially increasing costs for Canadians.

No requirement for federal Health Impact Assessments
Given the scale of energy use, noise, heat output, and environmental impacts associated with data centres, federal health‑impact assessments should be mandatory.

Cumulative impact assessments
Evaluating data centres individually creates dangerous blind spots. The federal framework must require regional cumulative assessments to understand combined impacts on air quality, water tables, infrastructure, and grid capacity.

Transparency and public access to information
The federal government must mandate public disclosure of site plans, energy demand, emissions, cooling systems, and independent third‑party review of all studies.

Data sovereignty and national‑security protections
Physical location alone does not guarantee Canadian data sovereignty. The federal framework must require:
• Full compliance with Canadian privacy, security, and data‑residency laws
• Mandatory assessment of foreign ownership and CLOUD Act exposure
• Regulation of cross‑border data transfers
• Conformance with Canadian Consent Standards
• Oversight of multinational cloud providers to ensure Canadian legal jurisdiction is preserved

Without these protections, Canada risks losing control over sensitive information, weakening national security, and undermining public trust.

Canada should not expand artificial intelligence infrastructure without enforceable federal environmental and health standards, transparent oversight, strong sovereignty protections, and clear public‑interest conditions. Integrating these measures will ensure that Canada’s digital future strengthens national competitiveness without compromising community health, environmental sustainability, or long‑term affordability.

I look forward to your response at your earliest convenience.