<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Dr AI will see you - soon]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">So here's the first study of using an AI to conduct virtual appointments:<br />
<a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.09861v1" rel="nofollow ugc">Towards Expert-level Medical AI for Real-time Video Consultations</a></p>
<p dir="auto">And this is the AI in question:<br />
<a href="https://research.google/blog/advancing-amie-towards-expert-level-audio-visual-clinical-consultations/" rel="nofollow ugc">Google's AMIE with video demos of clinical consultations</a></p>
<p dir="auto">While it's a preliminary study, I suspect we'll see this offered as service somewhere within the next 12 months.  And I also strongly suspect that it was trained on data from AI Scribes without patient consent.</p>
<p dir="auto">It's impressive - it demonstrates more empathy than several doctors I've had the misfortune to see.  It could help bridge the primary care doctor shortage - it could also push us towards a two tier system where only those who can afford it will get access to a 'real' doctor.</p>
<p dir="auto">Are we desperate enough to want to see this as an option when we can't get seen by a doctor in less than a month, if at all? Yes, I think it's likely that we are.  Could it augment frontline care and alleviate the burden? Yes, it probably could.</p>
<p dir="auto">Am I terrified that this is where we're heading? Yes, I definitely am.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.patientadvisors.ca/topic/2089/dr-ai-will-see-you-soon</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:05:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.patientadvisors.ca/topic/2089.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 03:20:15 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>