<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Article: What It Now Takes to Establish a Fact]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a href="https://www.techpolicy.press/what-it-now-takes-to-establish-a-fact/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.techpolicy.press/what-it-now-takes-to-establish-a-fact/</a></p>
<p dir="auto">"Today, faking things is getting cheaper and quicker. Meanwhile, verifying things can be expensive and slow. This asymmetry is getting worse since the reference points reporters and fact-checkers once checked against — websites, documents, public records, a voice on the phone — can now themselves be fabricated, so establishing one fact increasingly means establishing the facts beneath it. It’s a structural threat, more than any individual synthetic image. And dismissing something true is nearly free: anyone can call a genuine report machine-made, and the accusation collects a “liar’s dividend” reliably."</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.patientadvisors.ca/topic/2083/article-what-it-now-takes-to-establish-a-fact</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 14:29:32 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.patientadvisors.ca/topic/2083.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 22:03:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>